VirtualMini

Everything in the world !

federal appeals court skeptical of trump s travel ban - Search

The federal appeals court skeptical of trump s travel ban searched through all the site information that is gathered from around the web. To view the complete news story please click on the title link.



court will decide fate of trump’s travel ban later this week


the federal appellate court that will decide whether an order stopping president trump’s immigration ban in its tracks will be tossed or upheld won’t release it’s decision until later this week.“a ruling is not expected to come down today, but probably this week,” the 9th circuit court of appeals in san francisco said in a media advisory tuesday.trump cast his travel ban on people from seven muslim-majority countries as a key element of national security, hours before the appeals court was set to hear oral arguments in the case.justice department lawyers and opposing attorneys from the states of washington and minnesota were each given a half hour each to make their arguments.share this:






trump: i’ll take ‘common sense’ travel ban to the supreme court, if necessary


president donald trump speaks to business leaders during a strategy and policy forum at the white house last week. (jabin botsford/the washington post)president trump said tuesday that he is prepared to take the case for his now-frozen travel ban to the supreme court — but added that he hopes it doesn’t come to that.“we're going to take it through the system,” trump said. “it's very important for the country. … we’ll see what happens. we have a big court case. we’re well represented.”trump’s comments e as a federal appeals court prepared to hear arguments later tuesday on his directive temporarily barring refugees and those from seven muslim-majority countries from entering the united states. [federal appeals court decides to schedule a hearing on trump travel order] talking to reporters a






court questions whether president trump’s travel ban anti-muslim


by: ians | washington | published:february 8, 2017 9:13 aman us appeals court has questioned whether president donald trump’s travel ban discriminates against muslims, a media report said on wednesday. judge richard clifton asked whether it could be discriminatory if it affected only 15 per cent of the world’s muslims, the reported. clifton is one of three judges on the appeals court in san francisco, which will make its ruling later this week.there was an hour of oral arguments from both sides on tuesday. whatever the 9th us circuit court of appeals decides, the case would probably end up in the supreme court. trump’s executive order temporarily banned entry for all refugees and visitors from seven mainly muslim countries, until it was halted last week.






conway: travel ban part of trump's 'responsibility,' 'authority' and 'duty'


counselor to the president kellyanne conway defended president donald trump's executive order halting travel to the u.s. from seven majority-muslim nations monday, saying that trump "has a responsibility, the authority, and indeed, the duty to protect americans."conway spoke to fox news' "hannity" hours after the justice department filed a brief with a federal appeals court seeking the ban's restoration three days after a federal judge in washington state halted the order. justice department asks appeals court to restore trump's travel ban echoing the justice department brief, conway argued that friday's decision by u.s. district court judge james robart was "overly broad.""it’s a nationwide injunction," conway said. "he referenced religion where, in fact, that has nothing to do with the e






us appeals court denies request to immediately reinstate trump ban


major blow to president trump’s move to ban entry of citizens from seven muslim countries to usus president donald trump, flanked by vice president mike pence and chief of staff reince priebus, signs his first executive order on health care in the oval office of the white house in washington on jan 20, 2017.san francisco:  a federal appeals court has denied the justice department's request for an immediate reinstatement of president donald trump's ban on travellers and all refugees from seven muslim countries.the 9th us circuit court of appeals in san francisco instead asked both the state of washington and the trump administration early sunday to file more arguments by monday afternoon.the trump administration appealed a federal judge's ruling that temporarily placed the ban on hold. the






trump asks for very careful checkup of those entering us


washington: us president donald trump said that he has asked the department of homeland security to very "carefully" check those entering the country after a us court rejected a request by his administration to reinstate travel ban on citizens of seven muslim-majority nations. the us president continued to be critical of the judge for p ing an order that halted his executive order which banned people form seven countries frim entering the united states. "i have instructed homeland security to check people coming into our country very carefully. the courts are making the job very difficult!" trump tweeted. "just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. if something happens blame him and court system. people pouring in. bad!" trump said. earlier in the day, a us federal a






eras let the public see the travel ban battle. they belong in more courtrooms.


when a federal judge halted president trump’s immigration executive order last friday, the news was at first little more than a terse line on phone screens and cable-news chyrons, implying a thousand unanswered questions: what holes did the judge find in the trump administration’s arguments? to what degree was the decision based on the constitution’s guarantee of due process or of equal protection? on the separation of church and state? why did district court judge james l. robart go further than other federal judges had before him in stopping the executive order’s phase-in?the judge’s written ruling was not very illuminating. but mr. robart sits in a judicial district that has been experimenting with eras in the federal courtroom, and every minute of the oral arguments that led to his dec






us court rejects donald trump's appeal to reinstate travel ban that was temporar


in a major blow to united states president donald trump, the us court has rejected the appeal filed by the trump administration to reinstate the travel ban that earlier blocked by a seattle judge.earlier today, donald trump on february 5 lashed out at the federal judge who blocked his travel ban from seven muslim-majority nations. terming it as “terrible decision”, trump said, “when a country is no longer able to say who can, and who cannot, come in & out, especially for reasons of safety &.security – big trouble.”additionally, the trump administration filed an appeal against the ruling and erted that they will overcome the judge’s decision on the travel ban. trump has filed an appeal in the ninth circuit court of appeals, and have urged them to set aside ruling given by the federa






donald trump blasts courts for blocking travel ban, warns of ‘peril’


by: afp | palm beach | published:february 6, 2017 6:53 am us president donald trump (file p o)president donald trump blasted the federal courts for a second day in a row after his efforts to implement a travel ban were suspended and warned that the judiciary could be placing americans in “peril.” “just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. if something happens blame him and court system. people pouring in. bad!” the president tweeted sunday, after uncharacteristically taking a nearly day-long break from twitter. “i have instructed homeland security to check people coming into our country very carefully. the courts are making the job very difficult!”watch what else is making news:the saga began on january 27 when trump issued a blanket ban on all refugees, as well as






veteran d.c. judge named chief of court of appeals


a 22-year judge in the district was selected thursday as the head of the d.c. court of appeals.judge anna blackburne-rigsby, 55, was named chief of the d.c. court of appeals after the current chief, eric t. washington, announced he would not seek a fourth consecutive term as head of the nine-member court.the court of appeals is one of the most powerful courts in the district, overseeing d.c. superior court cases that have been under appeal. the court also oversees the d.c. bar, which incudes the admission of attorneys to the bar, as well as the discipline of its members.blackburne-rigsby was the only candidate vying for the chief’s position, according to the district’s judicial nomination commission, which selected blackburne-rigsby as the court’s chief. the seven-member commission include






states say lifting halt on trump's travel ban would 'unleash chaos'


lawyers for minnesota and washington state told a federal appellate court monday that it would “unleash chaos” if it lifted an order temporarily halting president trump’s ban on refugees and travelers from seven predominantly muslims countries from entering the u.s.the states said in briefs filed with the san francisco-based 9th u.s. circuit court of appeals that trump’s travel ban harmed residents, businesses and universities and stated that the ban was unconstitutional.the legal maneuvers by the two states were accompanied by briefs filed by the technology industry arguing that the travel ban would harm their companies by making it more difficult to recruit employees.tech giants apple and google, along with uber, filed their arguments with the court late sunday.a federal judge in seattle






iran lifts ban on u.s. wrestling team


iranian media reported on sunday that the country has lifted its ban on u.s. wrestlers, allowing them to participate in the freestyle world cup later this month.the report by the semi-official fars news agency quotes foreign ministry spokesman bahram ghasemi saying that the ban was lifted after the "discriminative restrictions" on iranian nationals travelling to the u.s. was suspended by a federal judge.the wrestlers were originally banned from the feb. 16-17 competition after president donald trump temporarily suspended travel from seven muslim-majority countries, including iran.the trump administration is now appealing to reinstate the travel ban. on sunday a federal appeals court denied the justice department's request for an immediate reinstatement of trump's ban on accepting certain t






legal nonimmigrants should only travel when necessary


a seattle federal judge has stayed president trump’s 90-day ban on entry and visa issuance to nationals of iraq, syria, sudan, iran, somalia, libya and yemen. trump has appealed the court’s order and we expect the ninth circuit court of appeals’ answer soon. i’m optimistic that the appeals court will uphold the district court’s stay. appeals courts are reluctant to reverse lower courts in emergency stay cases. plus, the ninth circuit is one of the most immigrant-friendly courts in the nation. here’s my advice: q: i’m in the united states. in my p port, i have a valid, unexpired visa. is it safe for me to travel abroad? a: yes, but i recommend necessary travel only. f-1 international students, h-1b temporary workers and other legal nonimmigrants should put off vacations if they can. despit






donald trump after travel ban block


united states president donald trump on february 6 erted that if something happens people should blame the judge and the court system for blocking the immigration order. in a major blow to donald trump, the us court rejected the appeal filed by the trump administration to reinstate the travel ban that earlier blocked by a seattle judge.expressing disbelief over the ruling trump said, “just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. if something happens blame him and court system. people pouring in. bad!” adding that he had instructed the security officials to keep a check on people entering the country.i have instructed homeland security to check people coming into our country very carefully. the courts are making the job very difficult!you may also like— donald j. trump (






donald trump’s travel ban faces biggest legal test yet


by: ap | san francisco | published:february 8, 2017 6:59 am the justice department filed a new defense of the ban monday. (ap p o/file)president donald trump’s travel ban faced its biggest legal test as a panel of federal judges prepared to hear arguments from the administration and its opponents about two fundamentally divergent views of the executive branch and the court system. the government will ask a federal appeals court to restore trump’s executive order, contending that the president alone has the power to decide who can enter or stay in the united states. but several states have challenged the ban on travellers from seven predominantly muslim nations and insisted that it is unconstitutional. tuesday’s hearing was to unfold before a randomly selected panel of judges from the san






appeals court denies trump request to immediately reinstate travel ban


early sunday morning a federal appeals court denied the justice department's request for an immediate reinstatement of president donald trump's ban on accepting certain travelers and refugees.the doj filed an appeal of a judge’s order temporarily stopping trump’s travel ban on urday night, saying it’s the “sovereign prerogative" of a president to admit or exclude aliens.the 9th u.s. circuit court of appeals in san francisco instead asked for the justice department to file a counter-response by monday afternoon.the higher court's denial of an immediate stay means the legal battles will continue for days at least.the appeal stated that the district court’s ruling “conflicts with the basic principle that an alien seeking initial admission to the united states requests a privilege and has no c






donald trump slams 'so-called' judge who blocked travel ban, appeals against rul


united states president donald trump on february 5 lashed out at the federal judge who blocked his travel ban from seven muslim-majority nations. terming it as “terrible decision”, trump said, “when a country is no longer able to say who can, and who cannot, come in & out, especially for reasons of safety &.security – big trouble.”additionally, the trump administration has filed an appeal against the ruling and have erted that they will overcome the judge’s decision on the travel ban. trump has filed an appeal in the ninth circuit court of appeals, and have urged them to set aside ruling given by the federal james robart, a george w. bush appointee. u.s. district judge james robart in seattle put a nationwide block trump’s travel ban that he had imposed on citizens of seven muslim






us court to hear arguments on trump's travel ban


a u.s. federal  appeals court tuesday will hear arguments over president trump’s controversial temporary travel ban, and whether trump’s order should be restored after last week’s federal judge’s ruling.the filing with the ninth circuit court of appeals e three days after a federal judge in washington state halted trump's order and granted a nationwide stay.the justice department said u.s. district judge james robart's order was "vastly overbroad" and said trump's executive order was "a lawful exercise of the president's authority over the entry of aliens into the united states and the admission of refugees."the appeals court refused to immediately reinstate the ban, and lawyers for washington and minnesota -- two states challenging it -- argued anew on monday that any resumption would "un






court denies trump request to immediately restore travel ban


washington: a federal appeals court denied early sunday the justice department's request for an immediate reinstatement of president donald trump's ban on accepting certain travelers and all refugees. the 9th u.s. circuit court of appeals in san francisco instead asked challengers of the ban respond to the appeal filed by the trump administration late urday night, and for the justice department to file a counter-response by monday afternoon. the trump administration declared that a federal judge in seattle overstepped his authority by temporarily blocking the ban nationwide. now the higher court's denial of an immediate stay means the legal battles will continue for days at least. acting solicitor general noel francisco forcefully argued urday night that the president alone has the power






crunch trump ban hearing: judges consider decision


appeals court panel appears sceptical as justice department faces tough grilling in san franciscokay aull, from left, holds a sign and chants with beth kohn, paul paz y mino and karen shore outside of the 9th u.s. circuit court of appeals in san francisco, tuesday, feb. 7, 2017.los angeles: the justice department faced tough questioning tuesday as it urged a court of appeals to reinstate president donald trump’s travel ban targeting citizens of seven muslim-majority countries — put on hold by the courts last week.in an hour-long telephone hearing, an attorney for the government argued that the immigration restrictions were motivated by national security concerns and that a federal judge had overstepped his authority in suspending them.“this is a traditional national security judgment that






how prejudice by whites may keep black college sports stars from getting paid


justice department appeals to restore trump travel banin a brief filed with the u.s. court of appeals for the 9th circuit, the acting solicitor general described a judge’s temporary halt to president trump’s order on immigration as “judicial second-guessing”and an “impermissible intrusion” on presidential authority.while his administration followed the court’s order, the president tweeted an extraordinarily personal criticism of u.s. district judge james l. robart. democrats accused the president of trying to intimidate the judiciary.






donald trump appeals judge's decision to suspend partial travel ban


washington: the administration of us president donald trump on urday began the process of appealing the decision of a federal judge who suspended the application of an immigration ban to citizens of seven muslim-majority countries, the media reported. in a short document presented to the 9th circuit court of appeals, based in san francisco late urday, trump and his cabinet formally appeal the judicial decision that has temporarily blocked the controversial executive order and has reopened the country's doors to millions of immigrants and refugees, efe news reported. the notice of appeal was made in the name of trump, homeland security secretary john kelly, secretary of state rex tillerson, and the united states of america. the parties above appealed to the 9th circuit court of appeals the






how prejudice by whites may keep black college sports stars from getting paid


justice department appeals to restore trump travel banin a brief filed with the u.s. court of appeals for the 9th circuit, the acting solicitor general described a judge’s temporary halt to president trump’s order on immigration as “judicial second-guessing” and an “impermissible intrusion” on presidential authority.the 9th circuit denied a request for an immediate reinstatement of the ban and instead asked the state of washington and the trump administration to file more arguments by monday afternoon.while his administration followed the court’s order, the president tweeted an extraordinarily personal criticism of u.s. district judge james l. robart.






donald trump: donald trump's administration appeals judge's block of travel ban


washington: donald trump's administration has appealed a federal judge's order+ that blocked the us president's ban on travelers+ from seven muslim-majority nations. the justice department appeal comes one day after a us district judge filed a nationwide order halting the ban's implementation. since then, the department of homeland security has reverted to standard, previous procedure in admitting people from the affected countries. the department of justice declined to comment on the appeal "beyond the filing at this time," in an email to afp.






watch live: federal appeals court to hear battle over trump’s travel ban


{* #registrationform *} {* traditionalregistration_emailaddress *} {* traditionalregistration_p word *} {* traditionalregistration_p wordconfirm *} {* traditionalregistration_displayname *} {* traditionalregistration_captcha *} {* traditionalregistration_ageverification *} by clicking "create account", you confirm that you accept our terms of service and have read and understand our privacy policy. {* /registrationform *}






trump’s nomination of neil gorsuch is a promise kept to conservative media


twelve days after supreme court justice antonin scalia died, in february 2016, the republican presidential candidates took the stage for the final debate before super tuesday. conservative radio host hugh hewitt, a panelist that night in houston, directed his first question to ted cruz."do you trust mr. trump to nominate conservative justices?" hewitt asked.like others in the conservative media, hewitt was concerned that trump — who previously described himself as "very pro-choice" — would be unreliable. after cruz deflected the inquiry, hewitt questioned trump directly."will you commit to voters tonight that religious liberty will be an absolute litmus test for anyone you appoint, not just to the supreme court, but to all courts?" he asked."yes, i would," trump replied.if hewitt had any l






donald trump faces uphill battle to overcome court’s hold on travel ban


by: reuters | published:february 6, 2017 7:02 am us president donald trump. (reuters file p o)u.s. president donald trump faces an uphill battle to overcome a federal judge’s temporary hold on his travel ban on seven mainly muslim countries, but the outcome of a ruling on the executive order’s ultimate legality is less certain. any appeals of decisions by u.s. district court judge james robart in seattle face a regional court dominated by liberal-leaning judges who might not be sympathetic to trump’s rationale for the ban, and a currently shorthanded supreme court split 4-4 between liberals and conservatives.watch what else is making newsthe temporary restraining order robart issued on friday in seattle, which applies nationwide, gives him time to consider the case in more detail, but als






donald trump faces deadline in court battle over travel ban


by: afp | washington | published:february 7, 2017 8:04 am u.s. president donald trump returns a salute as he steps from marine one upon his return to the white house in washington february 6, 2017. reuters/kevin lamarquethe us government has defended president donald trump’s travel ban as a “lawful exercise” of his authority, and claimed that a federal court made a mistake in barring enforcement of the measure. with the ban suspended since friday, the legal battle has moved to san francisco, where justice department lawyers monday defended the executive order and said the nationwide injunction against it was “vastly overbroad.” a hearing has been set in the case for tuesday at 3:00 pm (2300 gmt).meanwhile two new polls show that a majority of americans now oppose the ban, which sparked ch






tech giants file legal brief opposing immigration ban


several technology giants, including apple, google and microsoft, banded together on sunday to file a legal brief opposing president donald trump’s temporary immigration ban, arguing that it “inflicts significant harm on american business.”the brief, filed in the u.s. court of appeals for the 9th circuit, included other top tech firms including facebook, twitter and intel, as well as non-tech companies such as levi strauss and chobani. in all nearly 100 firms, including ebay, netflix and uber signed onto the brief.trump’s temporary immigration ban, the most contentious policy move of his first two weeks in offices, faces crucial legal hurdles.his administration has a deadline on monday to justify the executive order temporarily barring immigrants from seven mostly muslim countries and the






trump says blame immigration ban judge if something bad happens


president trump took to twitter just before his interview aired on fox sunday to blast the federal judge who halted his immigration ban and to encourage homeland security officials to “check people coming into our country very carefully.”“just cannot believe a judge would put our country in such peril. if something happens, blame him and court system, people pouring in. bad,” trump tweeted.the president issued an executive order on jan. 27 that barred us entry by nationals from seven muslim-majority countries — iraq, iran, syria, somalia, sudan, libya and yemen — for 90 days; suspended all refugee admission for 120 days; and barred syrian refugees indefinitely.but the decision friday in washington state by federal judge james robart put the order on hold.“i have instructed homeland securit






court denies doj request to reinstate trump's travel ban


a federal appeals court early sunday quickly denied the justice department’s request to immediately reinstate president trump’s controversial travel ban. the denial – which e in the 9th u.s. circuit court of appeals in san francisco – means trump’s executive order blocking people from seven majority muslim nations from traveling to the united states remains suspended, at least for now. sunday’s denial e hours after the trump administration filed an emergency stay appealing a u.s. district judge’s decision to place a nationwide block on the order. u.s. district judge james robart of seattle – an appointee of former president george w. bush – dealt the order a stinging legal blow friday, saying "there's no support" for the government's contention that the ban was necessary to protect the un






trump aides might be considering a major change to the president’s maternity lea


federal appeals court sets tuesday hearing on travel banthe hearing comes as lawyers for the justice department urged judges to restore president trump’s immigration order, calling it a “lawful” exercise of his authority and erting that a u.s. district judge’s decision to temporarily stop it was “vastly overbroad.”meanwhile, tech companies, law professors and former high-ranking national security officials joined a mushrooming legal paign to keep the measure suspended.






trump aides might be considering a major change to the president’s maternity lea


federal appeals court schedules tuesday hearing on travel banthe hearing comes as lawyers for the justice department urged judges to restore president trump’s immigration order, calling it a “lawful” exercise of his authority and erting that a u.s. district judge’s decision to temporarily stop it was “vastly overbroad.”meanwhile, tech companies, law professors and former high-ranking national security officials joined a mushrooming legal paign to keep the measure suspended.






trump’s travel ban: what happens next?


thousands gather at a denver park on feb. 4 for a rally to support the muslim community and to protest president trump’s executive order temporarily banning the u.s. entry of some refugees from seven muslim-majority countries. (brennan linsley/ap)a ruling by a federal judge in seattle temporarily blocked the enforcement of president trump’s travel ban. the suspension means people who were previously banned will have more time to reach the united states.trump’s executive order called for temporarily barring refugees and citizens of seven muslim-majority counties from entering the united states. [opposition to trump travel ban grows as key court decision looms] on sunday, two appeals court judges on the west coast declined to immediately restore the ban, but they asked to hear more arguments






trump’s travel ban: what happens next?


thousands gather at a denver park on feb. 4 for a rally to support the muslim community and to protest president trump’s executive order temporarily banning the u.s. entry of some refugees from seven muslim-majority countries. (brennan linsley/ap)a ruling by a federal judge in seattle temporarily blocked the enforcement of president trump’s travel ban. the suspension means people who were previously banned will have more time to reach the united states.trump’s executive order called for temporarily barring refugees and citizens of seven muslim-majority counties from entering the united states. [opposition to trump travel ban grows as key court decision looms] on sunday, two appeals court judges on the west coast declined to immediately restore the ban, but they asked to hear more arguments






legal battles to test donald trump and his immigration ban


by: reuters | washington | published:february 6, 2017 1:30 pm demonstrators against the immigration rules implemented by us president donald trump’s administration, rally at los angeles international airport in los angeles, california. (source: reuters)president donald trump’s temporary immigration ban faced on monday the first of several crucial legal hurdles that could determine whether he can push through the most controversial and far reaching policy of his first two weeks in office. on monday, the government has a deadline to justify the executive order temporarily barring immigrants from seven mostly muslim countries and the entry of refugees after a federal judge in seattle blocked it with a temporary restraining order on friday.watch what else is making newsthe uncertainty caused






‘in their courtrooms, they’re protected by people like me’: dhs secretary weighs


homeland security secretary john kelly predicted tuesday that the trump administration will prevail in its bid to reinstate an executive order temporarily barring refugees as well as people from seven muslim-majority countries from entering the united states and mused that judges might be considering the matter from an “academic,” rather than a national security, perspective. “of course, in their courtrooms, they’re protected by people like me,” he said. testifying before the house homeland security committee, kelly forcefully defended president trump’s executive order. he said that it is “entirely possible” that dangerous people are now entering the country with the order on hold — as trump has said via twitter — and that officials might not know about them until it is too late. “not unti






two states file papers fighting trump travel restriction


us president renews twitter attacks asking people to blame the judge ‘if something happens’washington: lawyers for washington state and minnesota have told a federal appellate court that restoring president donald trump’s ban on refugees and travellers from seven predominantly muslim countries would “unleash chaos again.”the filing with the 9th us circuit court of appeals in san francisco e early monday after the white house said it expected the federal courts to reinstate the ban.trump’s executive order was founded on a claim of national security, but lawyers for the two states told the appellate court the administration’s move hurts residents, businesses and universities and is unconstitutional.the next opportunity for trump’s team to argue in favour of the ban will come in the form of a






doj tries to block judge's ban ruling with late night motion


shortly after midnight, the department of justice slipped in an emergency motion challenging a washington state court's authority and decision to "second-guess" president trump on his controversial travel ban. the after hours filing demands an emergency stay pending its appeal and claims that the public is at harm without the administration’s travel ban. a seattle federal judge on friday interrupted trump's executive order prohibiting travelers from predominantly muslim countries in the middle east and northern africa. "unlike the president, courts do not have access to cl ified information about the threat posed by terrorist organizations operating in particular nations, the efforts of those organizations to infiltrate the united states, or gaps in the vetting process," the doj wrote in






air france reopens us flights to p engers hit by travel ban


paris: air france said on urday it had reopened us-bound flights to p engers affected by president donald trump's travel ban on nationals from seven muslim-majority countries, after the executive order was temporarily suspended by a federal court. "starting today we are implementing this court decision," air france spokesman herve erschler said. "nationals from the countries concerned are being authorised to fly once again to the united states, providing their papers and visas are in order." erschler said american government representatives in paris had advised local airlines they could resume us-bound services for citizens of iran, iraq, libya, somalia, sudan, syria and yemen. a federal judge in seattle on friday suspended trump's week-old executive order barring their travel.